Mina Elias Amazon PPC: Who He Is and How His Method Actually Works
Mina Elias is a chemical engineer turned supplement seller who founded Trivium Group and PPC University. His method centers on manually working the search term report — harvesting converting terms, negating waste, and using bid changes on a bulk sheet to push spend toward what already sells.
What this looks like across the book we manage
Who Mina Elias Is
Mina Elias built a supplement brand while working full-time as a chemical engineer, funding the ad spend himself and learning Amazon PPC the slow way — trial, error, and his own money on the line. That brand still runs today, and it's the credibility behind Trivium Group, the agency he started after other sellers began asking him to manage their accounts.
He later packaged what he learned into PPC University, a paid course with 300+ students and 60+ modules covering campaign structure, targeting, bid strategy, search term reports, and Amazon DSP. He's also active on LinkedIn, where his more recent posts talk about building AI agents to speed up the account audits he used to sell as a $5,000, three-week deliverable.
None of this makes him unique in being a practitioner-turned-teacher — plenty of Amazon PPC educators have that arc. What sets his content apart is how mechanical it is: he teaches the actual sheet-level workflow, not just concepts.
The Core Method: Harvest, Negate, Repeat
The backbone of his teaching is the search term report, pulled and read regularly rather than glanced at monthly. The logic is simple: a search term that's already converting under a broad or auto campaign is proof of demand, and it deserves its own exact-match campaign with its own bid. A search term burning clicks with no orders is proof of the opposite, and it gets negated before it costs more.
Here's the arithmetic that makes the decision, not just the theory. Say a search term shows 40 clicks, 3 orders, and $52 in ad spend against an average $60 sale price — that's roughly 29% ACOS at the term level, worth pulling into its own exact match campaign at a bid you control. A neighboring term with 85 clicks and zero orders isn't underperforming, it's telling you to cut it before it costs another $100 this month.
The mistake most sellers make applying this isn't the math — it's the patience. Pulling the trigger on 15 clicks and no sale isn't a pattern yet on most search volumes; it's noise. We've made this exact error ourselves: killing a keyword at eight clicks because ACOS spiked, only to see later that it converts reliably by click ten. The report tells you what happened. It doesn't tell you the sample size was too small to act on.
Using PPC to Move Organic Rank
The other piece of his framework that doesn't show up in most beginner content is using PPC deliberately to influence organic rank, not just to drive direct sales. The idea: a keyword that converts well under a paid click also tells Amazon's algorithm something about relevance, and sustained ad-driven conversions on a term can pull the organic ranking for that same term upward over time.
This only works if you're tracking organic rank on the specific keywords you're pushing spend against — not just watching total sales. Without that tracking, you can't tell whether a budget increase actually moved rank or just bought more of the same clicks at a higher cost. This is the piece sellers skip most often, because it requires a rank tracker running alongside the ad account, not just the Amazon ad console.
Bid Math and Bulk Sheets
At scale, his method moves from the campaign manager UI into bulk sheets — spreadsheets that let you push bid changes across hundreds of keywords in one pass instead of clicking through them one by one. The logic is target-ACOS driven: raise bids on keywords running under target, cut bids (or pause) on keywords running over, and check placement reports separately, since top-of-search and rest-of-search often carry very different efficiency for the same keyword.
- Placement-level ACOS — top of search usually costs more per click but converts better; blending it with rest-of-search numbers hides which one is actually working.
- Bulk sheet cadence — weekly is the rhythm he teaches; monthly is too slow to catch a bleeding keyword before it costs real money.
- Bid step size — small, frequent adjustments beat large infrequent ones, because a big bid cut can also kill a keyword's delivery entirely.
The Process, Staged
The table below lays out the audit cycle as he teaches it — the same shape, roughly, that any account running search term harvesting and bid management week over week will follow, regardless of who's operating it.
Where Automated Management Fits Alongside This
The method works. It also takes real hours — pulling reports, building harvest campaigns, adjusting a bulk sheet, checking placement data, checking rank — every week, for every ASIN. That's manageable for one brand run by someone who knows it intimately. It gets harder past a few dozen SKUs, multiple marketplaces, or a small team stretched across other work, which is exactly where sellers start looking for something that runs the same discipline without the weekly manual labor.
That discipline — evidence before a change runs, a way to measure whether it worked, and a rollback if it doesn't — is the same standard any serious PPC process should meet, whether a person is running it by hand or software is running it on their behalf. That's the standard Dr. PPC, from Full Circle, builds its account management around: every proposed change carries the evidence behind it, a measurement plan, and a rollback trigger before it runs, priced at $300 a month plus a capped 3% of ad spend, with Orbit — the analytics and tracking suite, the same kind of tooling this method depends on — included rather than sold separately. It's not a replacement for understanding the mechanics Mina Elias teaches; it's what running those mechanics looks like once an account is too big to do by hand.
| Stage | Objective | What You're Checking |
|---|---|---|
| Search term report pull | Find who's already converting or bleeding spend | Clicks, orders, and spend per search term |
| Harvest to exact match | Give proven converters their own campaign and bid | Term-level ACOS or CPA against target |
| Negative matching | Stop paying for clicks that don't convert | Clicks with zero orders past a reasonable sample size |
| Bid adjustment via bulk sheet | Push spend toward winners, pull back from losers | Placement-level ACOS, top-of-search vs. rest |
| Organic rank check | Confirm spend is lifting rank, not just running in place | Weekly rank tracking on ad-driven keywords |
Which one you should actually pick
Mina Elias's method suits sellers willing to spend real hours weekly in the search term report and bulk sheets, and his course is built for exactly that kind of DIY operator. It suits less well once an account spans dozens of SKUs or a stretched team — that's where automated execution of the same logic earns its cost.
Shortlist on the job, not the feature grid. Pull your search-term report for the last 90 days and total the spend against terms that produced no orders — 48.5% across the 47 brands above. Then ask each vendor on your list what they would do about it in week one, and see who answers with a process rather than a screenshot.
Common questions
Is PPC University, Mina Elias's course, worth taking?
It depends on what you need. If you want to understand the actual mechanics of running Amazon PPC yourself — campaign structure, search term reports, bulk sheets, DSP basics — it's a genuinely detailed course built by someone who ran his own account for years. It won't manage your account for you, and it won't replace the weekly hours the method requires once you're applying it.
Does Mina Elias personally manage PPC accounts?
He built Trivium Group as the agency arm of his work and trained a team to apply his methods to client accounts. The course and the agency service are two separate offers — one teaches you to do it, the other does it for you.
Can I run his search-term harvesting method without an agency?
Yes. It's a spreadsheet-and-discipline process, not proprietary software — a search term report, a bulk sheet, and a consistent weekly cadence get you most of the way there. The limiting factor is usually time, not access to the method.
How is automated PPC management different from what he teaches?
His method is manual and educational — you learn the audit, you run it yourself. Automated management, like Dr. PPC, applies the same underlying logic (harvest, negate, adjust bids, check rank) continuously across an account, with evidence and a rollback attached to each change, without requiring someone to run the spreadsheet by hand every week.
What's the biggest mistake people make copying this method?
Acting on too little data — pausing or harvesting a keyword after a handful of clicks instead of waiting for a sample size that actually means something. The search term report tells you what happened, not whether it's a pattern.
Dr. PPC runs your Amazon ads daily — an AI agent doing the work, operators from a $500M+ Amazon team supervising. $300/mo + 3% of ad spend, published and capped, month-to-month. Orbit is included.
Start free for 30 daysRead next
- Amazon PPC Software Comparison: Who Publishes a PriceComparison · amazon ppc software comparison
- Downstream Cost: The Price Sits Inside a Cobalt QuotePricing · downstream cost
- Adtomic Pricing 2026: The Add-On Price No Longer ExistsPricing · adtomic pricing
- Scale Insights Pricing 2026: Every Rung and the 1% PlanPricing · scale insights pricing
- Helium 10 Pricing 2026: Every Tier and the 2% Ads FeePricing · helium 10 pricing
- Sellerboard Pricing 2026: Four Plans and the Order BandsPricing · sellerboard pricing
Part of
- Every Amazon PPC tool we have comparedIndex of the comparison set
- Dr. PPC’s libraryEvery guide, benchmark and answer in one place
- Agency vs software vs AI-managedThe decision underneath all of these